On the end of the world

WWZI think I may be a tad obsessed with apocalyptic and post-apocalytic scenarios…I can’t quite recall when this started but it certainly wasn’t there in my earlier years. I think it developed gradually with the realisation of how throughly humans have messed things up, coupled with a creeping cynicism. A reboot of the human race seems necessary and though yes, I’d be sad to see many fine people gone, it seems inevitable and at least we’d all go together XD
I think what also appeals to me (and apparently millions of other people) is the chance to return to basics,  a fight for survival and reliance on wits…it’s a grand-scale adventure with the direst of consequences. And thus whether it be the Day AfterTtomorrow scenario, the 2012 scenario, the Zombie Apocalypse, it doesn’t matter – it’s all very thrilling and has a morbid pull. As these types of scenarios become more popular, I have to wonder if it’s a growing global disillusionment with the way we’ve managed the planet, the realisation that we’re ultimately all doomed anyways (the sun will after all explode in a few million years) or something else entirely…

In any case, last night I saw World War Z – a movie I’ve been most excited to see ever since I saw a blurb about it last year, which actually prompted me to buy the book the movie is based on. I loved the concept of the book, which is sort of an anthropologically-centered global oral account by survivors of the zombie war 10 years after the outbreak. It was a fascinating twist and I wondered how it would translate to the big screen. Turned out it translated not so well. Not in its original form, that is. XD. The movie was beset by many challenges including numerous rewrites and at the last minute they reshot the entire ending (!) I must say I very much prefer the ending we get to see in theatres now, as the original ending was a bit of a downer…
But for a proper review of the movie:

The Pros: it was very well executed with the actors doing a great job (and I have just loved Mireille Enos ever since the first season of The Killing). They had to cut many, many details and aspects from the book, but it worked very well for the medium of film. The pacing was vibrant and I can’t remember the last time I was so tense at some parts of a movie – it really sucked one in. The musical score was noteworthy from the opening credits and at several points I turned to hubby and said ‘I love this music!’ XD . Turns out a lot of the music I loved was done by Muse, and Brad Pitt took especial care to ensure the score would be exceptional. Bravo Brad it shows!

The cons – This is a very personal drawback and for some people might actually be a pro, but the lack of gore was very disappointing XD. The movie is rated PG13 (which is really interesting for a ‘zombie’ movie) and there’s a noticeable lack of blood and gore of any kind. As a huge Walking Dead fan, I guess I’ve come to expect to be shown that shot of the zombie’s brain being splattered. It’s really a visceral satisfaction that World War Z deprives you of. Though mind you, the acting and editing compensates for it – I’m not sure non-zombie fans would even notice it.

My last comment is again a personal preference. The movie distorted and changed certain stories from the book (as is inevitable I guess) but the one concerning Israel was a bit disappointing. The book attracted me because of it’s global scale – I mean which other novel can you recall that mentioned both Guyana and Barbados?! – something missing in many apocalytic stories, which tend to either focus on the US or the UK and might occasionally throw in a cut-away mention to say, oh Japan or the MiddleEast, as if to say ‘Yea we didn’t forget about the rest of you guys, you’re being affected too’. The book paid due to almost all the corners of the Earth and it was a very refreshing change.

In the final analysis, I would wholeheartedly recommend the movie (and obviously the book). Go see it and then start working on your zombie survival plan…I know I have 😀

On the ancient pastime of drive-ins…

photo (13)This one is going to be a quickie – I just wanted to take some words to appreciate the heck out of the Drive-in Theater here. I was there 2 nights ago and as the intermission came on they started playing authentic 1950s music that I haven’t heard since forever. I had a moment of time and space connected-ness with everyone who has every enjoyed the unique beast that is a drive-in and thought what a sad, sad thing it is that it seems to be going extinct.

There was a Drive-in in Guyana but it went bust sometime in the late 90s I think. In any case I never got a chance to patronize it..probably because I knew so few people who had vehicles back then XD Come April 1998, and I’m on a class trip to Barbados (my first trip overseas!) and one of the outings is to see the blockbuster ‘Titanic’ at the Drive-in. Needless to say, it was a very memorable experience as Titanic became one of my favorite movies for the next few years.

That drive-in in 1998 was the same one I was at 2 nights ago. It offers 2 movies for 7.50$US (and not old movies either, but two of the same ones that are playing in other theaters around the island). The food is delicious and very fairly priced. Popcorn is 1.50$US and a serving of BBQ chicken with fries 6.50$US. Beat those prices in any theatre! You don’t even need a car – they have a central area by the food where you can sit and watch/listen, though seating is limited to about 15…

If you’ve never experienced the joy of picnicking outside your car in the drive-in, or the honking of horns at a particularly applaud-worthy moment in a movie, then I urge you to. I hope the drive-ins of the world never become extinct, long live the drive-in!

PS- I don’t know the owners of the theatre, nor do I have shares XD but here’s the website, you should visit when next in Barbados!

Nasx!

On really, really, REALLY disturbing movies

Hmmm it’s weird that I haven’t blogged for a while even though I have more ‘free time’ now more than before…but moving on!

irrev
So I found this list of the 50 most disturbing movies ever via my good and fellow morbid friend :). I found it intriguing because I had surprisingly only seen about 8 on that entire list. As a self-professed connoisseur of different and definitely disturbing films you can imagine how disturbed I was to find these many films had escaped my attention (see what I did there XD). I resolved to rectify by watching all the other movies on the list I thought worthy of checking out.

NB: Be warned that you might not want to ever see any of these films..ever…even the ones I would recommend. These are only the films I’ve seen thus far.

Let’s start with the ones I would recommend –

Se7en – if you like serial killer movies with a twist and a deep personal choice that you can’t help but ask yourself, then this is one for you. The mood and the acting by big names Brad Pitt, Morgan Freeman, Gwyneth Paltrow and Kevin Spacey is spot on. This is a film i’ve seen quite a few times and it never gets old.
The Exorcist – Not quite sure why this is on the list, as I don’t find it especially disturbing, maybe because the genre had advanced so much by the time I finally got around to seeing this. It was definitely groundbreaking, however and has great atmosphere. It’s a classic anyways, so give it a watch.
Clockwork Orange – ok ok I confess – I haven’t seen this movie in its entirety, I was sleepy and nodded off. So why am I recommending it? The bits I saw were disturbing indeed, more in moral implications than in gore or anything tangible. Andy McDowell is amazing and it’s a classic. Speaking of And,y if you want to see him in another more-deserved- of- the- title ‘distubing’ movie – check him out in Caligua. I have no idea why it’s not on this list.
Night and Fog – this is an old documentary in french (with english subtitles) about the holocaust and you can see it for free on Youtube. The images are graphic in spite of the grainy-ness and it’s to be suffered through, even though it’s only 30 minutes. Everyone should see this, it’s a lesson, a warning and a wake-up.
I Spit on your grave – the version in this list is the original, but I’ve only seen the 2010 remake. It has its gruesome moments and is more ‘mainstream’ than some of the other films on this list, but it’s torture-porn/revenge done right with a great ending so if you wanted a little relief after some of the other films, watch this.
Irreversible – I debated about adding this to the recommended ones but I had to. It’s a french movie (find a version with subtitles) told backwards about a rape in Paris and the consequences. The first 20 minutes are reeeaally hard on the senses, a combination of the crazy camera work, the audio and the snatches of imagery which culminates in a brutally graphic killing. Stick with it though and it gets to a more tolerable pace, though about half way we’re shown the rape – all 10 minutes of it – from an unflinching view. I fast forwarded. After that we’re left to ponder and think as things get a little more mundane. I think it’s one of the best films to deal with rape in a most brutally honest but non-exploitative way. So I would recommend it, but be prepared to close your eyes.

Recommended, depending on…

Hostel – This is well known and amped up the torture gore factor in the mid 2000s. Some people like it, some don’t. It definitely has it’s gorey moments, but is kinda thin on plot and acting. Watch if you’re curious, but I prefer the sequel, so maybe check that out after if you want.

Natural Born Killers – When this came out in 1994 it was hugely controversial and has been reported to have inspired real-life incidents. When I saw it during the late 90s it left a huge impression, it was the most violent film I had seen thus far. I’ve seen it a few times since and I think it has a lot of layers and great cinematic style, but only watch if you don’t mind the quirky style and extreme violence (though to be fair I can think of a good lot more recent movies that are more violent)

Kill List- this one was different…crossing many genres and ending with a twist. I really enjoyed the beginning, especially the dialogue, but I felt cheated and a bit ‘wtf-y’ at the end. After googling what other people thought was the point of the movie, I appreciated it a bit more, but still felt ‘unfulfilled’. It’s really not that disturbing, especially in the scheme of this list, but it will stick with you I’m sure.

Happiness – This one is a dark comedy with fun themes like pedophilia, rape, murder etc. There’s almost no onscreen nudity or violence. Everything is more implied, and boy is it disturbing as hell! It’s excellently acted and directed and I would have recommended for all, except not everyone could handle its pacing or the characters.

Antichrist – This has no relation to the satanic horror film, but is instead about a couple’s grieving and loss. And how the shit then hits the fan. The first half is pretty ponderous (thought there’s a brilliant opening scene), then the second half is populated by weird things and acts, including homemade surgery. The director made this movie in the throes of depression and it shows in some searingly authentic scenes. The imagery is amazing but the acting and plot are so-so at best. It’s one of those movies you’d love or hate, so watch if you like artsy disturbing films, but look out for that surgery!

Martyrs – This movie starts off as a ‘typical’ Japanese style ghost/monster film and descends into something else entirely. I don’t want to give away anything but this is a movie you’ll never forget, partly because of imagery and partly for the ending. It’s pretty brilliant that way actually…

A Serbian Film – Banned in several countries and probably the most controversial of the 21st century films on this list. This is not for the regular movie goer, or even the regular gore-fan. There is extreme sexual violence and baby rape (yes you read that right). The director said it was a metaphor for what Serbia as a coutry has had to endure. Whatever. Seems thin to me, but there’s an obvious meaning about money, corruption and sexual perversion that doesn’t have to be searched for. I saw the edited version which just showed enough thank you. I see no reason for there to be anything more graphic, the implications are enough, and there’s plenty graphic-ness in any case. I was feeling morally equitable at the ending, then the last 10 seconds ruined it! This one is a doozer…watch at own risk.

DO NOT recommend!

Cannibal Holocaust – I had never heard of this 1980 movie until 2007 when I watched it. I never need to watch it ever again. There is a bit of story to it – some filmmakers go into the amazon to film cannibalistic tribes and themselves  perpetuate atrocities. It’s also the first ‘lost footage’ type film that has become popular recently. My main beef with it (which could be a good thing I guess) is that it’s too realistic. It was so realistic the Italians thought the Director had murdered his crew for real and ordered an investigation! Every disturbing scene,  including actual animal killings, will stay with you for the rest of your life, so think hard before you think to watch.

Salo or 120 days of Sodom – At least Cannibal Holocaust had a story, even if it could’ve been told less graphically..but often life is indeed bloody and graphic. So I won’t say don’t ever watch it, just be prepared for the consequences. Now THIS movie. It has no story (only in the loosest sense) and no redeeming qualities.

It’s based on the book of the same name written by the infamous Marquis de Sade in 17th century France, but is transported to WW II Italy. The entire story is that 4 evil men kidnap some boys and girls, keep them in a mansion and do all sorts of hideousness to them. Honestly the gore, violence or sexuality isn’t that overt or even ‘impressive’. I’ve seen way worse torture scenes and more graphic sex scenes. It was just the whole pointless unecessary-ness of it. I can understand the Marquis’ book being valuable for it’s history and the fact that the full range of human depravity being relatively un-chronicled back then. Now we have the mainstream – Law and Order SVU, for example – and the less so- the films on this list –  to show and remind us of these things, and done in a better way. Salo is not a piece of art, nor a film that needed to be made. Doesn’t need to be seen either, so skip this one.

On vampires and Spies…

Saw the last of the twilight movies 2 days ago.Not the proudest moment of my life but hey, t’was something to do…Afterwards it got me thinking that for all ‘we’ might scoff at the depiction of their ‘forever love’, it’s a very powerful message. Especially to a 14 year old girl. When I was 14 I discovered the vampire Lestat. This was the first time I’d been exposed to this sort of creature – ruthless, good-looking, sexually ambiguous, exciting. I wasn’t the only one enthralled – Anne Rice made a fortune out of those books. But to be truthful, if Stephanie Meyers had written twilight when I was 14, I probably would’ve fallen for that storyline too. *end of shameface*

Recently saw my other long time cinematic obsession -the latest James Bond movie – Skyfall. The Bond obsession started when I was about 12 and a family friend had a near delusional relationship with the character 🙂 He did Bond impressions, villain impressions, pretended his cat was Blofeld’s cat…Everytime we visited a Bond movie would be on. I had no choice but to get sucked in too XD. I’ve seen every single Bond movie, and up until a few years ago my favorite actor to play the character was Sean Connery. As much as I continued to enjoy the camp and predictability of the series, interest in it waned as I grew and it was obvious they started to just phone the movies in. Then in 2006 Casino Royale hit the screen. I had little hopes for this ‘blonde Bond’ but I would give him a shot. By the end of the opening scene it was clear that this was a new, vastly improved character and I had a new favorite Bond actor.

I don’t want to reveal any spoilers about Skyfall for those of you who haven’t seen it yet, but I would say it messes with the theory some fans have that James Bond is just a code word for different operatives. By the end of the movie the different mythologies and connective story webs from the previous movies draw closer and connect. 007 starts to resemble his predecessors more than ever, or more accurately, starts to morph into his former self. Javier Bardem’s villain is mesmerizing and quite sympathetic. The movie had its occasional flaws, but I would give it higher ratings than Quantum of Solace. It’s definitely worth the watch  – go see it if you haven’t already.

Happy Sunday and talk soon!

Nasx